aevakagi seems nice. i'm conflicted between yet another fucking subscription and the obvious rational for it
EDIT: lol i had no idea kagi was cancelled already sorry didn't get the memo
Cassandrich@aeva Just use a custom search URL to get working results rather than paying another bad reseller of Google/Bing results.
See also: https://goblin.technology/@dgold/statuses/01KS27XN21KCBNMPWN93GRQXA8
Gracchus Babeuf Bourguignon (@[email protected])
[1 media attachment] Lot of Kagi-shilling going on again after the latest nonsense from Google Please remember:- - Kagi requires you to sign in to use it; - So every search can be uniquely linked to your account; - If you pay for that account, this links to you as a real person. - Kagi's HQ is in Palo Alto, California, and is thus subject to US Laws; - This means their logs and records can be expropriated without a warrant by Federal Authorities; - Those authorities are currently under the control of an actual fascist demagogue. - Kagi began life as an AI-First Company. The name is a portmanteau of K and AGI -- Artificial General Intelligence. They are not a credible actor, and they are in no way safe for searching for (e.g.) Reproductive Health Providers.
@aeva They supposedly "buy indexes from Google", whatever that means. My understanding is that they do a little more doctoring of the results than direct resellers like ddg do, but AIUI they are not actually crawling and indexing the web like a real search engine.
Florian Schulze@dalias the problem of "how on earth do you make a new search engine today" is a super interesting problem since a significant part of the web has some kind of anti-bot challenge screen. I figured they must have had to make an under the table deal with cloud flare or something. Aggregating google and bing would be much simpler though.
@aeva It's interesting and difficult, but I don't think anywhere near as astronomically difficult as Google and Microsoft want you to believe it is.
You don't need to hammer every site every day. For the most part, information worth indexing does not change frequently. You also don't need to even bother with a site once you've determined it's SEO-slop.
dreid@dreid @dalias I have a similar theory, that one could produce a really good search engine out of something along the lines of a federated bookmark sharing system, and the web-of-trust strat would be a practical curation strategy. The hard parts are unfortunately not the technical aspects however. If I didn't have to work for a living I'd probably take this on as a major personal project, but given the major time sink it would be I don't know how to fit it into my life otherwise.
:: Asta ::
brib 
@aeva @dreid @dalias Sweet! Another person thinking about this problem!
I've been wondering about it too, especially how to build the indexers and the trust system. Going to bookmarks/sites already visited might be a decent place to start (although there are privacy issues involved when considering federation)
@brib @dreid @dalias one of my inspirations is firefox's bookmark tagging system, which replaced folder categorization for me a long time ago. Over the years I've had ideas for features that mostly amount to wishing I could partition private bookmarks in their own categories (eg, work, health care stuff, pronz, etc) that could be locked/hidden separately
@brib @aeva @dalias Yeah I'm pretty much ignoring federation here. My idea is that this is purely locally run software. The indexer is part of your browser, the search interface is part of your browser, except for fanout to blessed service specific search like wikipedia (or anything you can make a search shortcut for) as a fallback/enhancement.
Jeff Forcier