RE: https://mastodon.social/@SeanCasten/116597017246406093

TL;DR

In case you missed it:

1980s: Reagan and Justice #Scalia push #UnitaryExecutiveTheory arguing that the Constitution vests all executive power directly in the President.

2001–2008: #GWBush uses "Unitary Executive Theory" to consolidate security services and justify signing statements on laws passed by Congress.

2014: #Trump stated on air: "If I decide to run for office, I'll produce my tax returns, absolutely... And I would love to do that. He would go on to repeat this during actual campaigns. He did not release them. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_returns_of_Donald_Trump

2019 While Trump was president, a man hired under Trump's IRS gave #TaxRecords to the New York Times while Trump was defying a congressional subpoena for records they were allowed by statute: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_E._Littlejohn

2020: In Seila Law LLC v. CFPB the Supreme Court claims "the entire 'executive power' belongs to the President alone" and strikes down removal protections for the director of the CFPB.

2024: In Trump v. US the Supreme Court granted presidents broad, near-absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts. Also, the leaker of the records Congress couldn't get and that Trump promised was sentenced to 5 years in prison.

2025–2026: Over and over, "Unitary Executive Theory" is used to justify a purge of employees and departments Trump deems to be enemies.

2026/01/29: Trump sues his own IRS and Treasury over the leak of tax records that he had previously promised to release himself. He demanded 10⁶ × $10,000 — https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72207870/trump-v-internal-revenue-service/

2026/05/18: Before showing up in court to answer "is Trump just suing himself with our $$$ at stake?" they settled out of court for a reported 10⁶ × $1776 — no Court, no Congress, no Transparency.

Super TL;DR — By weaponizing the Unitary Executive Theory over decades, Trump sued his own administration as a pretext to, with his own lawyers on both sides, “settle” out of court to extract a $1.776 billion taxpayer-funded fund with zero public or congressional oversight.

Just corruption at a scale that dwarfs the Teapot Dome scandal, even when adjusted for inflation. Gigascale corruption.

Liz Oyer, former pardon attorney for the DOJ says this:

> Hey everybody. I try to bring you the legal news calmly and factually, but today the news is so outrageous that calm is just not possible. Today we witnessed what I would call the greatest abuse of our legal system in history. It rises to the level of a criminal conspiracy between the president and the Justice Department.

> The judge handling the case suspected the lawsuit was a farce. So, she appointed a team of independent legal experts to evaluate the merits of the case. They all agreed that it's nonsense and it should be thrown out. But before the court could toss the case, Trump's lawyers moved to dismiss it voluntarily. Why? Because Trump reached a settlement agreement with the Justice Department, which he controls.

> These five people have total discretion to give this money, our money, to anyone they choose with no oversight, no transparency, and no public input. I don't say this lightly. This is straight up criminal.

> This is a theft of our property. It is a fraud on the American people. It is a criminal conspiracy at the highest levels of our government. As the acting attorney general, Todd Blanche ... has a fiduciary duty to protect taxpayer money from false and fraudulent claims. He has abdicated that duty. He has betrayed the American people. He has betrayed his oath to uphold the Constitution.

> Please do whatever you can to spread the word and sound the alarm. Thanks.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/4bnF4IlufC8

Trump’s $1.8B “anti-weaponization fund”

YouTube
@Arpie4Math Mob rule
@darwinwoodka Not the self-gratification of the masses by the abuse of pure democracy but the capture of governmental authority by a criminal conspiracy.