Miguel Arroz1d ago

Re a post I did a few weeks ago: having to choose between technology preventing people to drive impaired and surveillance is a false dichotomy. Regulation can prevent that.

However if I really had to choose between tech that can prevent this, and drivers being subject to surveillance I would pick surveillance easily. I have more right to walk safely in a city than you to perform an extremely dangerous, highly regulated activity while maintaining privacy. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/police-vehicle-ramming-crash-vancouver-west-end-9.7200915

Senior in critical condition after alleged vehicle ramming in Vancouver's West End: police | CBC News

The Vancouver Police Department (VPD) says a senior and two police officers are injured after a driver allegedly rammed several vehicles and drove along a sidewalk in the city's West End neighbourhood Friday morning.

CBC
Show threadMiguel Arroz
Also look at the size of that car and think how many years “regulators” should spend in jail by allowing these things to be bought and used by anyone, and by allowing them to be driven in city cores among thousands of fragile human bodies.
May 16 at 7:19amIvory for iOS