Mastodawn

For the #jscc26 I have one #session #idea:
The types of #AI workers (ignoring the vibe coder).

Currently I see there are three types
1) The driven-by-AI, who accept all that AI throws at them and lets AI guide them
2) The AI-guide, the person guiding the AI through the topics, often struggling not to become type1.
3) The AI-controller, the person who lets AI do the work but only as they would do it, just faster (a better auto-completer).

There are many pros and cons to each.
wdyt?

Show thread

Nick Radcliffe May 14

@wolframkriesing I think that’s a bit like saying there are pros and cons for nuclear war and for not having a nuclear war.

The pros seem much larger and the cons much smaller for 3 than 1 (today).

Of course, this may change over time. (Nuclear war, not so much.)

Show thread

Wolfram wants peace May 14

@njr I can not really follow the nuclear war argument.
Maybe I should have narrowed it to programming, which is what I meant to mean

Show thread

Nick Radcliffe May 14

@wolframkriesing I just mean that if you put a gun to my head I could list pros for nuclear war, but they’d be really minor and forced. I think just letting a coding bot do its thing without guiding it is very short on pros as well. And while it might seem forced, there are plenty of scenarios in which letting a bot run wild might actually cause wars. As you know, LLMs are already used in current wars and are already deleting production databases and “attempting” to subvert controls, shutdown attempts etc.

Show thread

Wolfram wants peace

@njr I also heard the opinion for the sake of "productivity" and "output" we let AIs run "wild" and eventually it will also be smart enough to clean up all the mess, for now we have to win the (current) race. In competing company context I mean.
#justSaying