Jan D»Forgetting the bomb – can nuclear weapons be uninvented?«
For the #sts people: yes, it cites MacKenzie/Spinardi's
"Tacit Knowledge, Weapons Design, and the Uninvention of Nuclear Weapons"
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Tacit-Knowledge%2C-Weapons-Design%2C-and-the-of-Nuclear-MacKenzie-Spinardi/20e404e7bc69558bd7c451592338fdd9db0ff3f6
"Tacit Knowledge, Weapons Design, and the Uninvention of Nuclear Weapons"
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Tacit-Knowledge%2C-Weapons-Design%2C-and-the-of-Nuclear-MacKenzie-Spinardi/20e404e7bc69558bd7c451592338fdd9db0ff3f6
SnoopJ@simulo also worth mentioning that "destroying" the plutonium not beyond feasibility, with fast-neutron reactors. Accelerator-driven systems in particular.
Not simple politically, breeder reactors and hydrogen bombs still exist etc., but I do think it merits thinking about that even if they cannot be fully unmade, we could reduce the threat if the political will were there.
Chip Butty@simulo at also Roman Concrete https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_concrete and Chinese and Japanese martial arts https://academic.oup.com/dsh/article/39/2/575/7603922
tusk