I think of negative LLM impacts by “default outcomes”. A default outcome is high-velocity low-quality PRs. A default outcome is skill atrophy. Etc. I want more people to see that these are *defaults*, not inevitable.

If we approach each of these as a problem to be solved, we can steer the outcomes!

Some of these problems are *very* solvable — even in ways that are better than the pre-LLM baseline.

Some problems are harder; e.g. steering our educational system to handle this new world & student impacts quickly enough is… oof. All the more important we focus energy on the hard problems now!

And much of the anti-AI discourse seems focused on the more-easily-solvable problems (e.g. slop code) and not on the harder problems we should be grappling with.
The problems that get the most focus also seem like those capital already has a lot of self-interest in solving. Focus more on the societal impacts that don’t have a fast-enough self-correction feedback loop.