@EUCommission if you got an issue with my VPN, you got an issue with me!

Will you please stop attacking privacy and calling it safety? It’s called mass surveillance

@stux why are you yelling at EU comission due to a research paper reporting on VPNs done by a different organisation? Which itself just quotes another article with your contraversal take?

Do you not even check for truth before falling for social media propaganda?

@jernej @stux The official think tank of EU posted on x the opinion stating:
'Protecting children online is a priority, with new rules being implemented requiring a minimum age for access to some services'.

He is rightfully yelling to the executive branch of EU who will implement the law recommended in this article, because he knows where this is going and wants to prevent it before it passes into law, before it is too late to do anything about it. I hope this answers your question.

@JakeKb @stux Please go read what they actually wrote before screaming.

And this isn't USA - it's not a "think-tank".

@jernej @stux I did, I just quoted to you their tweet. It does not matter what the rest of the article is saying since their summary for the public was this. It is quite clear from the tweet what their position is on the matter and what they want the public and the commission to take from it. Also they actually define themselves as a think tank and serve the same purpose as think tanks.

@JakeKb @stux So you only read the tweet and not the actual report (which is all it is - a report). Ok.

Demanding that EU doesn't commission reports on important topics you dislike is undemocratic and tyrannical. Demanding that results aren't quoted because you don't like them is the same.

If you want it live in the land of fake news where government doesn't research topics before legislating - USA is just across the pond.

@jernej @stux And pushing for internet censorship is not undemocratic and tyrannical? Are you not at all concerned about where this is going? No one suggested EU shouldn't do research, but since no one is god, we have the right to disagree with that research when see it as problematic. Why are you so angry at people expressing very reasonable concerns?