"We've got about 30 NZers have come up here with us, at very short notice, from the companies that are going to benefit the most from the exports."

#ToddMcClay, Minister of Trade, 2026

https://www.rnz.co.nz/podcast/mediawatch?share=70ee68b9-d637-43c9-a68d-b0ac60b813f2

Oh no, McClay said the quiet part out loud! These "free trade agreements" are for the benefit of *companies*, not ordinary kiwis. He was meant to keep that to himself and spin the usual line about how it benefit us all. Oops!

(1/?)

#FreeTradeAgreements #FTA #MediaWatch #RNZ #podcasts

Mediawatch podcast

A critical look at the New Zealand media.

RNZ

NZ has signed up to dozens of these FTAs (Feudal Tyrant Appeasements) over the last few decades, under both blue and red governments. Most recently the TPP under the Ardern government. With full support from Dogwhistle Peters, Shame Jones and Winston First, I might add.

Over the same period, both objective poverty *and* inequality have consistently increased in Aotearoa. If these FTAs had any capacity to improve life fot ordinary kiwis, we would have seen some by now.

(2/?)

I want to clarify that my longstanding objections to FTAs - unlike Winston First's road to Damascus (re-)conversion post-2018 -, have nothing to do with the cynical FUD that WF are spreading about immigration. In a world trade system where jobs can be arbitrarily moved from country to country, I absolutely support treaties that allow workers to migrate freely between those countries (like the freedom of travel between EU countries).

(3/?)

There are sound political-economic reasons to object to FTAs. We don't need to invent racist ones. A political party would only do that (in an election year no less) to cynically bait electoral hooks with people's racism. This is who Winston First are in their current incarnation.

Which is why it's so deeply disappointing that Labour refuse to rule out a coalition with them, so people wanting a change of govt know that salivating when the redneck bell is rung won't get it for them.

(4/?)

If you want good reasons for the left to keep fighting FTAs - as we have since the 1990s - just ask Te Pāti Māori;

"We haven't had an FTA that has a strong Treaty clause in it yet - that protects Māori interest, that protects Aotearoa's interests ... Tiriti o Waitangi is not just for Māori benefit, it also benefits the whole of Aotearoa to ensure that we're not subject to international and corporate exploitation."

#RawiriWaititi, 2025

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/582598/labour-greens-in-the-hot-seat-over-india-free-trade-agreement

(5/?)

#TeTiritiOWaitangi #FTA

Labour, Greens in the hot seat over India free trade agreement

<i>Analysis - </i>Winston Peters' opposition to the India free trade deal has turned what could have been a huge win for the prime minister into a complex political scrap.

RNZ

Sadly the Greens have not been as clear in rejecting the India FTA as they have in the past with others (again, most recently the TPP).

"But before finalising a position, they are demanding the full details of the agreement, and they want it publicly released."

#RussellPalmer, 2025

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/582598/labour-greens-in-the-hot-seat-over-india-free-trade-agreement

I don't disagree with the call for transparency. But baiting electoral hooks with a pretence that they're not against FTAs in principle is just as cynical as Winston First's spin.

(6/?)

Labour, Greens in the hot seat over India free trade agreement

<i>Analysis - </i>Winston Peters' opposition to the India free trade deal has turned what could have been a huge win for the prime minister into a complex political scrap.

RNZ

Perhaps one reason the Greens have failed to take a firm, principled position all along, is they're afraid their political-economic objections will be lumped in with Winston First's racebaiting against Indian migrants. If so, this is yet more evidence that the Greens' turn to identitarianism has *weakened* their once formidable commitment to social justice (which must include economic justice), not strengthened it;

https://strypey.dreamwidth.org/6069.html

(7/7)

How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Everyone - Part 3 - What's Going Wrong With the Green Party?

Fair warning, this gets long. Very long. That's why I've broken it into sections, so you can skip the boring bits:<br /><br /><b>Prologue:</b> Who am I and why do I care enough to write this, carefully edit it over weeks, and then make it public? Not a Green member, but a Green ally.<br /><br /><b>P

Dreamwidth Studios

"So in other words it's not the butter chicken tsunami but the silver tsunami of Baby Boomers heading into retirement ..."

#ColinPeacock, 2026

https://www.rnz.co.nz/podcast/mediawatch?share=70ee68b9-d637-43c9-a68d-b0ac60b813f2

Check your facts Colin. The youngest Baby Boomers were born in 1964 and are now about 62, the vast majority have already retired. We're only a few years off the oldest Gen Xers retiring. If the retirement age hadn't been pushed to 65, to make Boomers work 5 years longer than their parents, they would have already.

(1/2)

Mediawatch podcast

A critical look at the New Zealand media.

RNZ

All of this talk about pushing the age up further is ludicrous. If anything the retirement age ought to be brought back to 60. Why?

1) Gen X is a significantly smaller cohort than our parents

2) We haven't benefited from the cradle to the grave welfare system Boomers' parents bequeathed them, and which political leaders have spent decades burning in the engines of wealth concentration

3) As a result we probably won't live as long on average as Boomers. Particularly Māori

(2/2)

#PolicyNZ

"Frankly I think it's pretty outrageous that the details of the agreement were not shared in advance of ratification. Not only with the media, but with the NZ public. And I've never seen a situation where the details have not been shared and up for public discussion in advance."

#AnnaFifield, 2026

https://www.rnz.co.nz/podcast/mediawatch?share=70ee68b9-d637-43c9-a68d-b0ac60b813f2

Anna either has selective amnesia about how FTAs work or has not been paying attention, because this is standard.

(1/?)

Mediawatch podcast

A critical look at the New Zealand media.

RNZ

The secrecy surrounding negotiations is one of many reasons opponents have always called FTAs antidemocratic. They're negotiated in secret by trade delegations from participating countries, and the public only knows what's in them after they're signed.

I was part of the PublicACTA meeting that drafted the Wellington Declaration against ACTA;

https://www.fsf.org/campaigns/acta/why-acta-declaration

The only reason we had a copy of the ACTA draft is that it had been leaked by a member of 1 of the delegations.

(2/?)

Why The Firm, Simple Declaration Against ACTA — Free Software Foundation — Working together for free software

"But in this case it does seem like a really like concerted effort to 2 ... journalists at TVNZ, who are doing critical coverage of them."

#AnnaFifield, 2026

https://www.rnz.co.nz/podcast/mediawatch?share=70ee68b9-d637-43c9-a68d-b0ac60b813f2

Fifield points out earlier in the story that Ani O'Brien is not a journalist, and spreading this scuttlebutt about Parliamentary journalists a year after the fact is not journalism. Bang on. O'Brien is a female Cameron Slater and this is Dirty Politics 101 stuff.

(3/?)

Mediawatch podcast

A critical look at the New Zealand media.

RNZ

I'm sure I'm not the only one who noticed O'Brien exposed (one might even say *manufactured*) this scandal involving Parliamentary journalists at a very convenient time for CLuxon. Who was under pressure from the very same political journalists to front up to public about the parlous state of the National leadership.

A story that was quickly displaced by the one about journalists having a spat after 1 too many evening wines in the finance minister's office a year ago.

(4/?)

In the end the PM's team manufactured an illusion of caucus cohesion by getting CLuxon to call a vote of confidence. *Before* rivals had a chance to secure enough votes for a leadership change.

CLuxon's spin is that this means caucus is fully in support of the current leader. But if anyone out there believes that, I've got a Nigerian Prince on the line who needs your help.

(5/?)

When a leader poisons the ground under them to prevent leadership change bids from taking root, it can prevent a party having a competent leader for years afterwards. One might have thought the Nats would learn from the consequences of Snapper Key doing that. Clearly not.

Mind you, with the notable exception of Ardern - who was an effective party leader if not a principled PM - Labour has struggled to attract competent leaders since Helen Clark did the same thing.

(6/?)

Fifield goes on, describing Maiki Sherman and colleague;

"They work at a company that's backed by the state, vulnerable to pressure ..."

#AnnaFifield, 2026

https://www.rnz.co.nz/podcast/mediawatch?share=70ee68b9-d637-43c9-a68d-b0ac60b813f2

What? Isn't this what Winston First et al have been saying about publicly-owned news outlets and publicly-funded journalism? Aren't there meant to be safeguards preventing that?

I wish Colin Peacock hadn't cut this off with another question, because I'd love to know where Fifield was going with that.

(7/?)

Mediawatch podcast

A critical look at the New Zealand media.

RNZ

Circling back to the "free trade" propaganda, Peacock and Fifield make a lot of the Singapore FTA as supposedly helping us out in the deepening of the ongoing fossil fuel crisis. Due to the unprovoked US bombing of Iran.

But they also mention that NZ officials have been in Singapore - one of our 2 main fossil fuel sources - negotiating a new food-for-fuel deal. So how helpful was that FTA really? More to the point, would we be so dependent on Singapore as a supplier without that FTA?

(8/8)

@strypey same here, they raised it to 67 some years ago already, and I’m afraid they want to raise it again. For the same reasons, even… I don’t think we’re going to live as long or even stay sufficiently healthy for that long.

@mirabilos
> same here, they raised it to 67 some years ago already

Which country are you in?

@strypey Germany

@mirabilos
> they raised [the retirement age in in Germany] to 67 some years ago

In one of the wealthiest economies in the world? Where the number of people retiring has probably already peaked post-Baby Boom? Ludicrous.

Like Aotearoa, Germany needs to either means-test post-retirement welfare benefits, so the wealthy don't get them if they don't need them, OR, tax wealth sufficiently that the state can afford to pay everyone over 60 a benefit.

(or even better, everyone, UBI/ GMI FTW!)

@strypey tax everyone sufficiently and UBI is what we really need, but alas, the right wing is at the head atm, with an exceedingly arseholey chancellor

@mirabilos
> the right wing is at the head atm, with an exceedingly arseholey chancellor

I don't normally go in for intergenerational war narratives, but ...

Sometimes it feels like the Baby Boomers are vampire generation, and having sucked their parents' generation dry, and used up all the economic blood the Silent Gens tried to save for future needs, the Boomers are now trying to suck every last drop of economic blood from subsequent generations to keep themselves alive just a bit longer.

@strypey

What's bad is i thought this was commenting on the USA til I read Māori

Seems every government wants their citizens to work until death