Is it rude to interrogate downvoters?
https://piefed.blahaj.zone/c/casualconversation/p/691319/is-it-rude-to-interrogate-downvoters
Is it rude to interrogate downvoters?
https://piefed.blahaj.zone/c/casualconversation/p/691319/is-it-rude-to-interrogate-downvoters
There are some exceptions¹ but I typically don’t downvote people for asking why the downvotes.
That’s because I think the downvote button is an awfully vague feedback channel; it informs you people saw something they don’t like in your post/comment, but never what they did. Sometimes you can take a good guess, but it’s at most a guess, not knowledge².
In fact I wish the downvote button was multiple buttons: like “this is wrong”, “this is bad”, “this is unfunny”, etc. For this reason; it simply works better as feedback. Slashdot has a similar-ish system, but for the positive votes instead.
But I get why people voice that feedback through a downvote button: it’s fast. And also because it’s pseudo-anonymous³, so the poster can voice their take without inserting themself into the discussion. But IMO that’s a flaw, not a feature.
Punctuation is the text equivalent of prosody, the comma splice is not some “error” to be “fought against”, unlike what all those toilet paper manual styles literally screech against, they’re like those junk emails we get, comma splice is the equivalent of speaking fast and relatively uninterrupted, like I’m doing here, it’s a self-demonstrating example anyway, you probably get it, right.
…serious now. What you say in a discursive level IMO matters way, way more than how you say it.