There’s nothing that wrong with llm code but it’s sad (and probably rather detrimental in the long term) that instead of improving tooling, languages and concepts, the solution somehow is overseeing a probabilistic monkey just hammering it out.
@poni I think the idea is that now you may be able to just make all the perfect tooling for yourself, yourself.
That was my interpretation of https://mariozechner.at/posts/2026-03-25-thoughts-on-slowing-the-fuck-down/ anyway.
