@niavy These threads are a direct response to attacks on our project and exist to address the inaccurate claims made about the GrapheneOS project and our team. We're defending ourselves from /e/ and Murena along with their supporters continuing to mislead people about GrapheneOS.
We're going to address the fact that their supporters use the tactic of portraying our threads addressing their inaccurate claims to falsely present us as the aggressor. It's another of their inaccurate talking points.
@GrapheneOS
Look, I am following both. GrapheneOS AND /e/.
I've NEVER read GrapheneOS-bashing logorrhea like yours towards main LineageOS-based ROMs.
Really, stop victimising yourself and start acknowledging that every Google-shipped alternative ROM is a step towards better. Let users pick what they want.
@niavy Our thread directly addresses the false narrative you're peddling in your replies to it:
https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116388159407099477
GrapheneOS is relentlessly attacked across the fediverse and elsewhere by /e/, Murena and their supporters with the narratives we've addressed there. We've linked to major examples of it. This thread was made in response to recent attempts by /e/ supporters to mislead people about GrapheneOS with false narratives from /e/. You're doing the same thing we're addressing.
/e/ and Murena have been been promoting their products by misleading people about GrapheneOS for years. This has turned into an all out war on GrapheneOS by their company and supporters. We began regularly debunking their inaccurate claims and they try to frame it as aggression.
GrapheneOS
Niavy 
