You know, you shouldn't do #JMAP. It really is pretty awful. And while IMAP4 is weird, that's what you should do. But my real question is, what was the JMAP client I should try? 🙈
@helge Why’d you start on such a bizarre journey? Why care about JMAP at all?
@atlauren Because @obrhoff being annoying about it 🙈
I mean why not, more standards are better than less, and while it is not a good standard, it’s the sole one for HTTP based email, ie for webmail apps.
I also dislike the proposition that standards are hard, they usually are not. You can just do it, if you care.
@helge @atlauren Appreciate the effort to let me look like a fool. Although I thought it would be easier 😈
@obrhoff @atlauren I mean to be clear the claims of JMAP really are complete nonsense.
IMAP is awkward but hard to beat on efficiency, and the awkward part doesn’t matter that much because the libs are available.
If they would have branded that on what it is, mail for web clients, it would be more reasonable.
I suspect it’s because they can’t do stateful efficiently with Cyrus because it’s old, but I’m not sure.
@helge Did you meet the Fastmail folks while at CalConnect? Good blokes. IIRC they were significant movers WRT JMAP and particularly JMAP Mail.
@atlauren Yes I actually did! They are cool people generally. At the time it was jCal/jCard which are also kind weird. (but also easy to support)
@atlauren Just to be clear, the thing which rocks here is that they are not doing anything proprietary.
I think the claims are very misleading/wrong and generally it's not well done, but at least they, unlike others, are doing an open protocol others can implement. I'd still vouch for iCloud, because they apparently can do the actual standard w/o complaining 🙂