The IETF TLS chairs have now issued a "last call" for objections to non-hybrid signatures in TLS. Do they admit that their previous "last call" re non-hybrid KEMs ended up with a _majority_ in opposition, and that many opposition statements obviously also apply to signatures? No.

@djb

Why do they want non-hybrid KEMs and signatures, anyway? Seems like a bad idea to protect all of everything with nothing but unproven crypto.

@argv_minus_one If you really want to know, troll through the mail archives. It is not an easy task. But listening just to Dan is like getting all your news from Q-Anon.

@rsalz

Has anyone other than him done that task and published their findings?

@argv_minus_one I've already said what I think of his"findings."

@rsalz

That you did, but that's not the question I asked. I asked if anyone *else* has looked through the discussion archives and published *their* findings.