Journalaist Aleksandar Brezar compared statements from Yanis #Varoufakis article “Why I went to Moscow” with #Russia narratives. Not surprisingly, he found almost 100% compliance (the quoted block is Varoufakis, then Brezar’s comment):

Russia also has the right to seek security by demanding, as it has done for three decades, that Nato stay out of… Ukraine.

Putin: “Over the past 30 years we have been patiently trying to come to an agreement… (NATO) continued to expand despite our protests and concerns.”

Ukraine becomes in the 21st century what Austria used to be during the Cold War: a neutral but armed European country.

Peskov, March 2022: Russia would accept “the Austrian model” as “a certain compromise”.

The European Union unfreezes Russia’s assets and removes all sanctions.

Putin’s truce demands, Russian Foreign Ministry speech, June 2024: “All Western sanctions against Russia should be lifted.”

Ukraine becomes… a neutral but armed European country with its territorial integrity and political sovereignty jointly guaranteed by all European countries, plus Russia, under the auspices… of the United Nations.

Russia’s March 2022 draft treaty: “Ukraine should agree to permanent neutrality in return for international security guarantees from the five permanent members of the UN Security Council: Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States.”

Signatories shall agree on gradual elimination across Europe of certain categories of weapons, including nuclear.

Russian MFA draft treaty with US, December 2021: “The Parties shall eliminate all existing infrastructure for deployment of nuclear weapons outside their national territories.”

Europe’s leaders chose forever war.”

Many in the West have called it Putin’s forever war. Varoufakis flips it and blames Russia’s ongoing all-out invasion on Europe. “Forever war” is repeated, but Varoufakis doesn’t state who started it anywhere in the article.

He does mention “war’s commencement,” as if it’s a natural disaster that “commences” on its own.

Varoufakis avoids using the word “occupied” for Ukrainian lands throughout. The Donbas and “other territories” are “disputed” and “under Russian control”.

Crimea — illegally annexed in 2014 — is not mentioned once in the entire article. There is no mention of the ICC warrant against Putin, either. Or Russian war crimes.

Yet Varoufakis says that “all war refugees will have the right to return to their pre-2014 homes.” Not 1991, when Ukraine declared independence. No, 2014, when Russia illegally annexed Crimea.

Varoufakis also uses the Good Friday Agreement as a possible model. Except the agreement wasn’t signed while one country was bombing another and kidnapping its children.

Finally, Varoufakis says he visited Moscow last week for an “investment conference” and describes people in attendance as “Russian civil society.” The Russian civil society has been systematically dismantled since February 2022.

Oh, and he said that in Moscow, he also danced for peace. Yet now back home, he is advocating for what Russia wants and for what would effectively represent Ukraine’s capitulation, despite his pre-emptive protestations.

Source: https://xcancel.com/brezaleksandar/status/2042367610612863435?s=20

@kravietz

seems like a good deal to me

What's Europe's leaders' plan? Oh what's that? No plan? Just lofty proclamations about how Russia will be defeated with no plan, no putting money up to back their claims, no exit strategy. Just some vague hope we'll turn Germany's failing economy into a war economy by churning out tanks instead VW's. No end in sight but that's not a forever war.

@largo

No end in sight but that’s not a forever war.

Why do you assume Russia will fight the war forever? I just genuinely don’t understand this part. Why it’s Europe who has to “come up with a peace offer for Putin”? In 1939-1945 was it also Europe and USA who had to “come up with a peace plan for Hitler”?