Popular policies would be a better revenue raiser than taking fossil fuel and gambling donations

https://aussie.zone/post/31520530

Popular policies would be a better revenue raiser than taking fossil fuel and gambling donations - Aussie Zone

>Winning votes might be a better strategy than wining and dining the rich >The reality is that political donations from harmful industries are small relative to the payments parties receive from you, the voter. >Australia provides taxpayer funding to parties and candidates based on how many votes they receive. At the May 2025 federal election, each voter was worth around $6.80 in public funding, and that will rise to $10 at the next election – that’s $5 each for ballots for the House of Representatives and Senate. >Labor got $37 million in taxpayer funding after the 2025 election, the Liberal–National Coalition $33 million, the Greens $13 million and One Nation $6 million. >It pays to be popular. Winning the vote of an extra 1% of Australians (about 160,000 people) is worth $1.1 million, set to rise from next year to $1.6 million. Learnt a lot I didn’t know.

Is there a missing link to a post somewhere?
Popular policies would be a better revenue raiser than taking fossil fuel and gambling donations

Australians are naturally suspicious of corporate donations, especially when they come from vested interests with everything to gain from influencing government decision-making. But are these donations large enough to explain why politicians act the way they do? The reality is that political donations from harmful industries are small relative to the payments parties receive from you, the voter.

Oh no, again! Note to self: don’t put up a post when you’re in a hurry to get diner on! Thanks ZG!
What was for dinner?
Lentil and vegetable stew with Indian spices followed by fruit, chocolate and a nce herbal tea. Well, you know I’m vegetarian! 😀 🌿