I'm as fascinated by the Artemis II mission as many other people, but as scientist I'm frustrated that experts interviewed about it in the media are rarely asked to justify the truly astronomical cost. So far the program is reported to have cost $93Bn, with the direct costs of this mission alone amounting to more than $4Bn. I'm perhaps particularly sensitive to this because I'm frequently asked to justify funding three orders of magnitude smaller that we have used to improve knowledge of how the Antarctic ice sheet will respond to climate change and contribute to future sea-level rise.
@PoLaRobs I heard a NASA interview where they stated, "We're going to get a lot of great pictures." Like, wow.
@donlamb_1 Well for most of us that is the most obvious immediate benefit, but I think it would be impossible to come up with a plausible justification for the cost per picture.