If you happened to drop by Twitter any given moment and get into a conversation with a fan of Elon Musk, as carefully as possible, you might learn that Elon Musk is a man who does not care about #money.

You'd probably find that's true about any big-name #CEO or top business executive or prominent "founder" or dedicated "wealth builder". All of them, from top to bottom, will tell you over and over that they're not greedy. They don't suffer from avarice, oh no! Always these people claim that they aren't in business for the money. They have values. They have missions. They have noble intentions and utopian goals, and squeezing the world for all the money it can give them is only the humble means to the grander end.

It's like "Wayne Industries", right? It's accepted as a matter of course that #Batman should go on doing what he's doing—he's assumed to be a hero, a moral benchmark for everyone else—so he's got to make money, and thus Wayne Industries exists almost completely offscreen, the means by which Batman is able to afford bespoke crimefighting equipment and a batcave / garage / hangar / laboratory / archive / etc.

Now I'm sure there's many better-read Batman fans out there who could tell me about some storyline or miniseries in which Wayne Industries and its corporate life are actually central to the plot and not merely ornamentation to the Batman's heroic aspirations.

I will risk overgeneralization, and state that in Batman media meant for the widest possible consumption—e.g. hit TV series and films and video games—there's not usually meant to be much attention given to exactly how Bruce Wayne and his business empire make their money. We're generally supposed to assume that he's that outrageously unrealistic creation of U.S. popular entertainment, the Good Capitalist™. We are invited to accept the premise that Bruce Wayne is the ideal boss who pays well and treats his workers with compassion and mostly stays out of their way, because his real job is Batmanning.

That's a comic book businessman. That's also exactly how Sam Altman and Elon Musk and Jensen Huang and all the other corporate executives are routinely written about. For centuries now, U.S. media and journalism have been idolizing the Man of Business.

Ayn Rand didn't invent John Galt—she was not an inventive writer, not in the slightest—but instead grabbed for an archetype that already existed, that was already being created and puffed out en masse. Citizen Kane exists as a commentary on this self-aggrandizing culture of business titans who strive to present themselves as the great innovators and architects of society.

You'd think journalists would notice, at some point, that it's all smoke and mirrors.

@mxchara

Why would they notice? They're professional liars, propaganda operators, who sell themselves as watchdogs and saviors since forever too.