Bruce Schneier was on today's edition of The Tech Report, talking about the newest wank out of Anthropic.

He made a claim that he'd seen researchers compare the asserted performance of the new model (in the "system card" etc.) against previously-available models, and they were performing at about the same level (finding the same vulns, it sounded like).

Does anybody know what research he was referring to?

EDIT: FOUND! https://aisle.com/blog/ai-cybersecurity-after-mythos-the-jagged-frontier

A web search is not pulling anything up for me, because the infosphere is currently flooded with credulous repetition of Anthropic's marketing materials (and I have no reason to believe those aren't just lies)

AI Cybersecurity After Mythos: The Jagged Frontier

Why the moat is the system, not the model

AISLE
@SnoopJ I found the report that Schneier was talking about on the AISLE blog here: https://aisle.com/blog/ai-cybersecurity-after-mythos-the-jagged-frontier
AI Cybersecurity After Mythos: The Jagged Frontier

Why the moat is the system, not the model

AISLE
@krelnik thank you so much! my search skills were failing me but I figured Mastodon might come to my rescue, and indeed it did