✧✦Catherine✦✧monthly routine ^_^
Sebastian Cohnen@whitequark while I can personally understand the urge to "clean stuff up”, I wholeheartedly agree that these stale bots are just the worst.
@tisba being rude while saying "a friendly reminder" is really the thing that makes it insulting
Gwen the Loitering Fox 
@whitequark @tisba what I hate the most is that this is a reminder to whoever created the issue that "we haven't done anything about it in 30 days"
stale bots should be used to remind maintainers, not users, to keep up activity. Ideally a stalebot message should be:
Matthias Mair@gwenthefops @tisba @whitequark that depends on your view of what is “owed” ppl that use software that was published for free.
I noticed the last few years that more and more users seem to just snipe 3 half baked ideas into feature requests and fck off to never be seen again or answer any questions. If an issue has no one assigned to be responsible and no movement the bot closes it after 30 days. Anyone mad about it can get them self assigned
@matmair @gwenthefops @tisba open source is a collaborative enterprise. if you don't respect my time why should i respect yours? and if you insult me, why should i tolerate that?
@whitequark @gwenthefops @tisba I really do not see how a stale bot is an insult.
The example posted is an unfortunate case; at most after the second message / reaction cycle someone should deactivate the bot for that issue.
The cases that I try to solve are like this one: https://github.com/inventree/InvenTree/issues/9998 there is a question back and then just silence from OP. I spend 20-30 hrs a week co-maintaining that project for 5 years now.
@matmair @gwenthefops @tisba this is not an "unfortunate case", this is how the stale bot is normally deployed. and if you don't see how auto-closing an issue I could have spent hours or days debugging is an insult and a gravely disrespectful way to treat my time I don't think we have much to discuss