Yeah so let's refocus on the real perspective here. It doesn't matter at all how good these models are at code or finding vulnerabilities if we destroy our ability to seek and share knowledge.

https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/google-ai-overviews-misinformation

Analysis Finds That Google’s AI Overviews Are Providing Misinformation at a Scale Possibly Unprecedented in the History of Human Civilization

A new analysis commissioned by The New York Times suggests that Google's AI Overviews are wrong an astonishing percentage of the time.

Futurism

And look: I've spent time exploring the capabilities of these tools because I seek understanding through experience. I've been called spineless, fascist, racist, and just plain stupid for doing so. What I learned was important to my opposition to these tools, but also to my empathy for its users.

But the core truth remains. You cannot have what works without the attending toxins. They are inextricable. As ever, my primary contention is that the technology is destructive to the fabric of human society, and on those grounds should we make our stand.

@mttaggart the article comments that people don't check the AI overview, but the quality of search results is degrading quickly, making it harder to check them.

I frequently find that search result pages do not contain one of the words that I searched for, even when there are only 2 or 3, and putting terms in quotation marks no longer does anything.

@mspcommentary
Yes, this is also my experience. The quality of search results has degraded so much & so fast & the rate of degradation seems to have increased & continues to increase. It can be a real time suck wading thru’ the ‘finds’ to assess their ever dwindling relevance. Last time I did this there was zero relevance. The entire exercise was a waste of time. ☹️

#dwindlingRelevanceOfSearchResults #enshittificationOfSearch #SearchFunction

@mttaggart