Yeah so let's refocus on the real perspective here. It doesn't matter at all how good these models are at code or finding vulnerabilities if we destroy our ability to seek and share knowledge.
https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/google-ai-overviews-misinformation
And look: I've spent time exploring the capabilities of these tools because I seek understanding through experience. I've been called spineless, fascist, racist, and just plain stupid for doing so. What I learned was important to my opposition to these tools, but also to my empathy for its users.
But the core truth remains. You cannot have what works without the attending toxins. They are inextricable. As ever, my primary contention is that the technology is destructive to the fabric of human society, and on those grounds should we make our stand.
@drwho @mttaggart I'm not calling anyone a fascist who explores them, but I do call people fascist when they use them. Subtle, but vital difference.
The only issue I have with "informed opinions" is that you don't actually need one sometimes.
For example, I have never lost a leg. Yet I am perfectly capable of deducing from my life experience and examining my surroundings that it'd suck to lose one.
Exploration, fine, but sometimes it's just an excuse.
I can't judge which it is for you.
Taggart 
The Doctor
Jens Finkhäuser