Neil Brown4d ago

"Nearly nine out of 10 legal professionals say they use AI in some capacity ..."

Eh?

"... according to a survey for a legal tech company"

Oh. Right.

If it is important that your lawyer uses "AI", I'm afraid that I am not the lawyer for you.

https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/ai-is-mainstream-in-law-but-clients-are-not-told/5126414.article

AI is mainstream in law - but clients are not told

Despite the pace of adoption, only 27% of firms have fully embedded the technology, survey shows.

Law Gazette
Show threadNeil Brown4d ago
If your lawyer was using "AI", would you want to be told explicitly?
Yes
30.4%
No
0.9%
At that point I'd try to hire someone else
66.5%
Something else
2.3%
Poll ended at .
Show threadTroed Sångberg4d ago

@neil If the results are good I wouldn't have any opinions on how the work gets done.

I had that same philosophy as a manager. If people wanted to work out of a coffee shop I didn't consider that to be my problem as long as they delivered.

Mandating tools - esp. for people I hire - seems a bit strange.

Show threadChronocide
@troed @neil It's a sound argument thought I do think there should be _some_ restrictions in place. If someone gets the work done by hiring someone else to do it for them, I wouldn't be happy with that.
Apr 8 at 8:55pmWeb