@arstechnica This isn't even a meaningful claim. Overviews aren't binary "right" or "wrong". Maybe only 10% meet some extreme definition of "wrong", but none of them are accurate because they don't contain the key thing a search is looking for: provenance, a basis for knowing who the claims you're being presented with are coming from. And nearly all have some counterfactual claims.

@dalias

Analysis finds @arstechnica is wrong 10 percent of the time
Is 90 percent accuracy good enough for a news outlet?