We found an undocumented bug in the Apollo 11 guidance computer code

https://www.juxt.pro/blog/a-bug-on-the-dark-side-of-the-moon/

JUXT Blog: A bug on the dark side of the Moon

How a specification found what fifty-seven years of scrutiny missed.

Super interesting. I wish this article wasn’t written by an LLM though. It feels soulless and plastic.
For what it’s worth, Pangram thinks this article is fully human-written: https://www.pangram.com/history/f5f68ce9-70ac-4c2b-b0c3-0ca8...
A bug on the dark side of the | Pangram Labs

Does "A bug on the dark side of the " contain AI-generated text? Pangram finds that this document is We believe that this document is fully human-written

Pangram doesn't reliably detect individual LLM-generated phrases or paragraphs among human written text.

It seems to look at sections of ~300 words. And for one section at least it has low confidence.

I tested it by getting ChatGPT to add a paragraph to one of my sister comments. Result is "100% human" when in fact it's only 75% human.

Pangram test result: https://www.pangram.com/history/1ee3ce96-6ae5-4de7-9d91-5846...

ChatGPT session where it added a paragraph that Pangram misses: https://chatgpt.com/share/69d4faff-1e18-8329-84fa-6c86fc8258...

These are just some of the goo | Pangram Labs

Does "These are just some of the goo" contain AI-generated text? Pangram finds that this document is We believe that this document is fully human-written

This is useful, thanks! TIL