We found an undocumented bug in the Apollo 11 guidance computer code

https://www.juxt.pro/blog/a-bug-on-the-dark-side-of-the-moon/

JUXT Blog: A bug on the dark side of the Moon

How a specification found what fifty-seven years of scrutiny missed.

Super interesting. I wish this article wasn’t written by an LLM though. It feels soulless and plastic.
For what it’s worth, Pangram thinks this article is fully human-written: https://www.pangram.com/history/f5f68ce9-70ac-4c2b-b0c3-0ca8...
A bug on the dark side of the | Pangram Labs

Does "A bug on the dark side of the " contain AI-generated text? Pangram finds that this document is We believe that this document is fully human-written

Then pangram isn't very good, because that article is full of Claude-isms.

It has Claude-isms, but it doesn't feel very Claude-written to me, at least not entirely.

What's making it even more difficult to tell now is people who use AI a lot seem to be actively picking up some of its vocab and writing style quirks.