#paperOfTheDay "Large N solution of generalized Gross-Neveu model with two coupling constants" from 2009.
The Gross-Neveu model is a #quantumFieldTheory of fermionic fields with a 4-fermion interaction vertex. Such theory would be non-renormalizable in 4-dimensional nature, but the Gross-Neveu model is usually considered in 2 dimensions. Its interaction term is of the form (psibar*psi)^2, where psibar is the Hermitian conjugate spinor to psi (i.e. this interaction vertex has 2 incoming and 2 outgoing fermions). The theory has a global discrete symmetry psi -> gamma_5*psi, which effectively exchanges psi and psibar (gamma_5 is the 5th Dirac matrix).
On the other hand, one can augment this model with a second interaction term of the form (psibar*i*gamma_5*psi)^2. If both terms appear with the same coupling constant, the full model (assuming that there is no mass term for the fermion) has a continuous symmetry psi -> exp(i*alpha*gamma_5)psi. This is called "chiral symmetry", and the continuous parameter alpha gives rise to a massless Goldstone boson. The so-defined model is called Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model.
The present paper investigates the transition between GN and NJL model, that is, starting from only the Gross-Neveu interaction term, and gradually adding the other term until both of them are equally strong and the NJL model is recovered. Indeed, this results in a continuous interpolation between the two models. One can also view this as a version of chiral symmetry breaking "through interaction", which is different from the more familiar version of chiral symmetry breaking where the fermions simply get a non-zero mass term.
https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.80.125038
@paulbalduf Is this similar to the Higgs mechanism?
@sjb I don't have a complete overview of all the possible effects. In particular, the Higgs mechanism gives dynamical mass to gauge bosons, while the present effect is about fermions.
My impression is that it is similar, but not quite the same. In both cases, the chiral symmetry is broken not by an explicit mass term, but "dynamically", through the interaction of the fermion. However, in the 2-dimensional Gross Neveu case this is an interaction of the fermion with itself, while in the standard model there is the Higgs field as a separate entity (and the explicit 4-fermion interaction would be non-renormalizable). Perhaps one could see the analogy more clearly by integrating out the Higgs field to obtain an effective 4-fermion vertex, or by introducing an intermediate field into the Gross Neveu model to split the 4-fermion vertex. But I'm not exactly sure if it really works this way, in particular regarding the question whether these intermediate fields are massive or not.