So there is a right-wing dude on CNN saying that for 47 years, #Iran had a desire to bring about the end of the world with a nuclear weapon.

I just have to point out that the last leader had a fatwa (religious rule) against such.

From everything I have seen and read, that is a brutally oppressive regime. But still, some people seem to be flat-out lying.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatwa_against_nuclear_weapons

Fatwa against nuclear weapons - Wikipedia

@dalfen it's not entirely false (about end of times). The Iranian Islamic revolution saw Khomeini (first Supreme leader) as first of 3 harbingers to bring end of times (the other two were to be from sham/syria [i.e. hizbullah] and Yemen [I.e. houthis]). The religious theory outlines say to bring destruction to #mecca in Saudi, where then Muslims will have to March under the banner of #AlMahdi into #jerusalem to pray in #alaqsamosque. Doesn't have to be via nukes though.

@hszakher Very interesting. I know *some* about those beliefs, but not a whole lot. However, the way the person on CNN was pushing the narrative seemed false because he emphasized the nukes (perhaps trying to sway the American public ?), which contradicted what I had read about the fatwa. I wonder if now those in power in Iran might be more likely to pursue nukes, though, since that supreme leader, Khamenei, has passed.

/1 of 2... cont.

(also- it seems we might spell that name differently?)

@dalfen >> also- it seems we might spell that name differently?)
there is Khomeini (first supreme leader) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruhollah_Khomeini) and then 2nd supreme leader Khamenei (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ali_Khamenei). to add to the confusion, the 3rd leader is also Khamenei (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mojtaba_Khamenei) 😅
Ruhollah Khomeini - Wikipedia

@hszakher I see what you mean... I just read back.
Ah yes, that is confusing. I did type it correctly then... I was referring to the 2nd one.