Can you count the war crime intent admissions?
Can you imagine the number of tens of millions civilians therein threatened with up to including intentionally caused mass-deaths?
I'll remind you that even the THREAT of such "use of force" (in context meaning acts of war) is a violation of the UN Charter.
USA is a Rogue State.
That was also the reason USA got a UNSC mandate to invade Iraq 1991, because Saddam committed an illegal war of aggression against Kuwait for economic and political profit, occupation and eventually annexation. Sound familiar? Sound like some States you know of now? At least 4 at the top of my head, probably more.
Will USA also invade itself to end the crimes against peace and crimes against humanity now?

The very stable genius is volatile mad.
Again threatens further crimes against humanity, as part of the crimes against peace.

Hmm. Why "Fuckin’" not "Fucking"? Is "Fuckin'" not fucking swearing just as much?
Who are "you" here, is it the civilians whose life essential infrastructure you threaten to large-scale intentionally war crime devastate, or is it all of the world whose access to medicine, food, fuels, etc you personally have caused to be blocked?

'Trump says 'entire' Iran could be 'taken out' Tuesday'
https://www.lbcgroup.tv/news/world-news/922062/trump-says-39entire39-iran-could-be-39taken-out39-tuesday/en?src=rss&utm_source=TheWALL360&utm_medium=Rss-articles&utm_campaign=rss&utm_term=Rss
...again threatening further crimes against humanity on top of the crimes against peace.
Trump says 'entire' Iran could be 'taken out' Tuesday

| Lebanon News

LBCI Lebanon
@b9AcE you think he'll back down again or will they really go through with it this time?

@roadblock161_ I really don't know. Trump can't admit loss because loss would mean lost prestige and that's authoritarians' primary currency for maintaining entourage, while on the other hand the Iran-theocracy can't back down because then they may get lynched or sentenced to hang.
It seems slightly more likely to me Trump will see no other way out than to commit one of the world's worst war crimes campaigns ever than that the Iran-theocracy surrender to likely lynching,
unless of course Trump changes the terms of the deal to just accept a white peace, if the Iran-regime even would accept that by now, but then a white peace too will just be (correctly) presented by Trump's opponents as a loss anyway.

Soo... I wish it wasn't so, but currently it leans towards obliteration, I believe.

@b9AcE @roadblock161_ I fear your analysis is correct