I will never ask you why you don't offer a solution. I know that is what design is. Criticism identifies a purpose, design finds ways to satisfy it.
If you are going to identify a purpose, do it well.
always sucks to hear someone perfectly identify and articulate an obscure problem/purpose and then give in to pressure with a "if i had to suggest a solution..."
NO! It's ok to be good at cornering what's wrong, that's a skill
focus on making your criticism sharp. There is so much value in making an undeniable observation about how something is broken or how it could be much better.
If the designers* involved are genuine in their intent, they should not be able to ignore it.
*design is a process of purpose satisfaction, it is not figma or photoshop
design should always be free enough to determine that the purpose is not satisfiable with whatever means is being imposed on the process
commercial constraints should be acknowledged as what they are. They are a layer of circumstance.
