This is what tech is supposed to be. Innovation based on today's human knowledge to improve lives and prevent deaths. Not whatever this bullshit is that we're dealing with every day.
This is what tech is supposed to be. Innovation based on today's human knowledge to improve lives and prevent deaths. Not whatever this bullshit is that we're dealing with every day.
@mayintoronto yeah, the sentiment of the opening anecdote gives hope, but he's also a CEO of a giant corp which usually means skeletons in the closet.
I'm not inclined to dig further, but if I were, I'd start at "he was his destitute family's only hope" being closely followed by "he borrowed startup capital from his cousin."
What a story, terrific 😊
I'd like to find the person who wrote and the editor who left in the word "inhuman". Just because they can't conceive of somebody achieving something doesn't mean it's inhuman.
Not trying to draw attention away from the core statement, I can't shake the strong gut feeling that this text is LLM generated. It has this typical "droning" paragraph structure.
Also since when would be another media outlet be attributed as the author? And not, you know, as usual as "by ${author's name} for ${3rd party outlet}"
"Wang Chuanfu, BYD’s CEO, barely slept for weeks. Three passengers, all in their twenties. His chemistry. His cell. His company’s name on the casing. He had not built it to kill anyone, but it had."
I'm trying to imagine Elon Musk or really any other western billionaire being this affected when their product causes harm. I can't do it.