A bit of a wrinkle for pescetarians there.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-25837-0

Rapid self-recognition ability in the cleaner fish - Scientific Reports

Whether animals are self-aware has important implications for our approaches to both animal cognition and animal welfare. A landmark moment in animal cognition research was when great apes passed the mark-test and demonstrated mirror self-recognition (MSR). Animals that pass the mark-test are capable of visually self-recognising and considered to be self-aware. Other taxa, including a fish, the cleaner wrasse (cleaner fish: Labroides dimidiatus) have also now passed the mark-test, forcing a rethink of the mental and neurological requirements for MSR. Previous research has largely focused on which species can pass the mark-test, rather than the processes underlying MSR. Here, we marked mirror-naïve cleaner fish with an ecologically relevant mark resembling an ectoparasite and then undertook detailed behavioural observations after exposure to a mirror. We found that cleaner fish achieve MSR rapidly, implying self-awareness prior to mirror exposure. By observing the exact timing of MSR in individuals, we could also report previously undocumented differences in pre- and post-MSR behaviours, including post-MSR exploratory behaviour of the mirror’s reflective properties. We find remarkable parallels between the processing of MSR in humans and cleaner fish, suggesting that some aspects of self-awareness are conserved across animal taxa.

Nature

@bodil Aside from cleaner wrasse, manta rays also seem able to recognize themselves in mirrors.

That said, I personally think the mirror self-recognition test has the usual problem with human concepts of "animal intelligence", namely that we consider an animal intelligent when it acts kinda like a human. Mirror self-recognition sets up quite a lot of species to fail for reasons that have nothing to do with self-awareness. For example, many birds, insects and reptiles can see well into the UV spectrum, which isn't reflected properly by a typical mirror - so the thing they see in the mirror doesn't really look like themselves. Many animals don't even have vision as their primary sense.

I'm not sure I'm able to reliably identify my own scent, and thus I would probably fail a self-awareness test designed by dogs. (...but a garter snake would pass.)

@datarama …and don't get me started on our species's favourite sentience test, which is the ability to produce human language, which inevitably gets a lot of us convinced other animals have no sentience but LLMs do.
@bodil I remain absolutely convinced that my pet lizard has a far stronger claim to sentience than Claude does.
@bodil (I also don't think Claude's claim in that respect is any stronger than ELIZA's or Racter's.)