OK, it’s, admittedly, gorgeously produced. And I’m willing to give Stewart some considerable benefit of the doubt, given how primordially foundational his work has been for so much of who and what I am.

But opening it to see an ESR quote, in this day and age, feels greasy and retrograde and gross – not quite as bad as getting some DHH on you, but not far off, either. And it gets worse: I wouldn’t have bought the book in the first place had I known Stewart devotes an entire (brief) section to the design “of” Elon Musk, as if Musk had ever designed anything more elaborate than a stealthy excursion to a Black Sea hair-transplant clinic. That bit is all-but-disqualifying in itself, and tends to make me ashamed to have the book on my shelves.

The deeper issue, though, is Stewart’s narrow definition of “maintenance.” The book feels like it’s sidestepped a whole generation of discourse on the topic, to its detriment. I’ll let you know what I wind up concluding.

@adamgreenfield at first i was in love with the Kintsugi cover but ofc Kintsugi is about so much more than maintenance... and sounds like especially this person's take on it.. so given what you're saying the cover is perhaps a warning 😛

@joyfulcarla Yeah, maybe so.

My feelings about all of this are complicated by the fact that Stewart’s work — first with “The Whole Earth Catalog,” later with “How Buildings Learn,” and still later in personal interaction — has been sparking thought and provoking inquiry for me for literally fifty years of my life. We all have to kill the Buddha eventually, but that doesn’t make it particularly pleasant.

@adamgreenfield true enough. (one of the first things i wrote for others to read was called Kill the Buddha!).