When it comes to large language model-powered tools, there are generally two broad categories of users. On one side are those who treat AI as a powerful but sometimes faulty service that needs careful human oversight and review to detect reasoning or factual flaws in responses. On the other side are those who routinely outsource their critical thinking to what they see as an all-knowing machine.

brother this being the lede for a story from the ars reporter who wasn’t fired over the hallucinated quotes is just… this is the closest corporate media can come to “fuck that loser” and still make it to publication. jesus christ

@nmott Who is this from? They fired Benj Edwards over the AI quotes thing.
@TomSellers i know. it’s from orland, the one whose byline also appeared on the retracted story who wasn’t fired, presumably because he knew and knows better than that
@nmott Gotcha, thanks for the info. I thought it was just Benj
@TomSellers sure thing! link to the quoted story (didn’t share originally because i was too surprised by the lede to stick with it https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/research-finds-ai-users-scarily-willing-to-surrender-their-cognition-to-llms/ )
"Cognitive surrender" leads AI users to abandon logical thinking, research finds

Experiments show large majorities uncritically accepting "faulty" AI answers.

Ars Technica