the term “slop” has been so successful as a way of dismissing AI content with the appropriate level of care (none, as nobody who cared made the slop) that I’m starting to see AI boosters try to change the meaning of the word. it’s important to push back when you see these information colonizers:

- insist that genuine human effort is slop because it isn’t to their taste (ie the new Mario movie)
- claim that their AI output isn’t slop because they “checked” it and found it to be particularly good

@zzt on the last point: I think most fail to understand the difference between use value and exchange value. The use value of LLM output can be high, but the exchange value is practically zero since anyone with model access can reproduce it.

This is also why I eschew the notion of successful enterprises built on LLM output: the fewer the people, the less effort involved to clone, the less value.

@tnorinder @zzt Extremely Fungible (Lexical) Tokens