Trump has dismantled most of USAID. But what was it? How did it work?
The wealth gap between rich and poor nations is vast, but the fact that rich nations often need natural resources found only in poor nations creates a tension. USAID has always been contingent on poor countries not using that leverage too much.
1/
If US companies want to extract these resources they need to trust that their cobalt mine won't get nationalized or taxed too much or saddled with "unreasonable" safety regulations.
But why should the government or people in a poor nation play along? Is it not moral to nationalize the mine if millions of your people are sick or suffering from simple basic things that aren't even that expensive to fix?
USAID means that having good relations with America has benefits.
2/
The doctors, some NGO workers and volunteers who show up to give training and shots are often disgusted with this reality. There are OTHER good reasons why one might want to keep tuberculosis, malaria and AIDS at bay in this world. It's moral, it gradually makes the whole world more wealthy and stable, and it's safer. That is: USAID would benefit the US even if the cobalt mine were nationalized.
US business people do not want to hear this.
Anyway this has all been cut. 3/
@futurebird Foreign aid is one of those things that benefits both the Left and the Right. If you're a leftie, the arguments are clear. If you're on the right, then it's actually the cheapest way to solve your "immigration problem". Improve conditions in poorer countries and they're less likely to come to yours.
Oh, and one thing Covid should've taught us, is that sicknesses do not respect national borders.
myrmepropagandist
David Njoku