Thoughts on steams AI policy - Lemmy.zip

This is like a bunch of months late, but I am curious what people here thinks about steams new AI disclosure policy, which I think requires you to disclose or refrain from making AI content that is consumable, e.g the player sees and interacts with, whereas anything on the backend does not need to be disclosed, I know people are upset steam didn’t push for a complete disclosure, but imo I agree with this approach, if anyone uses it for asset generate, i think thats prohibited given they previously took down a game for potential copyright violations, but for things you can interact with, those are like the first thing that can appear as bugs which could very quickly fill steam up with slop/buggy games, but for stuff less visible, I don’t know, I guess wont matter as much? I worked on a few singleplayer games in the past (nothing on steam, also i did not use ai then). So I don’t know is it an important distinction? I don’t think i would be in favor with steam forcing people to disclose ALL uses of AI, like if its used appropriately like a tool, because too alot of people its all the same with no nuance, but thats just my opinion. In other very late news, pre-generated content and live-generated content is an important distinction with steam, with live-generated having much more scrutiny and being banned for any 18+ content, this makes sense for me, I don’t think anyone would disagree with this, but if anyone has any thoughts on this I am curious on what they are.