the term “slop” has been so successful as a way of dismissing AI content with the appropriate level of care (none, as nobody who cared made the slop) that I’m starting to see AI boosters try to change the meaning of the word. it’s important to push back when you see these information colonizers:

- insist that genuine human effort is slop because it isn’t to their taste (ie the new Mario movie)
- claim that their AI output isn’t slop because they “checked” it and found it to be particularly good

@zzt Ah.
1) AI creates slop.
2) Anyone who has worked with AI and found the results were not particularly sloppish, is obviously just an AI activist. Because, see 1)

Isn't that the kind of logic a sloppy AI would generate?

@papageier nah, they’re not an activist, just a fucking asshole incapable of noticing that the slop they’re involved in is hated by normal people