Natasha 
🇪🇺Ontologically speaking, this is evil
Sol R. ⛅@Natasha_Jay "Ceci n'est pas une pipe" 😄
Michael BaconCeci n'est pas un vélo.
stfn@Natasha_Jay At first I read your toot as "Ornithologically", and I got a bit confused
Mark Gould@Natasha_Jay That isn’t even *one* bicycle, let alone plural
Whine Spectator@Natasha_Jay @mhoye *grumbles* they can take the whole lane
Blackoverflow@Natasha_Jay
Democratic philosophy.
Democratic philosophy.
James White
TawdryHepburnI hate these things and I get them wrong all the time, to the extent I am not 100% convinced that I am not a robot. I am pretty sure they are not ASD friendly. Is the pole part of a traffic light? Is the banister part of the stairs? I hate these things.
@TawdryHepburn
I'm the same. Whether I use common sense or I'm pedantic, both methods seem so (inconsistently) "incorrect" in the view of some damn algorithm
I'm the same. Whether I use common sense or I'm pedantic, both methods seem so (inconsistently) "incorrect" in the view of some damn algorithm
Parade du Grotesque 💀"Ceci n'est pas une bicyclette"
Michael T Babcock@Natasha_Jay it says bicycles not bicycle signs, so I'd just choose the middle four and be okay with it.
Bruce Heerssen 
It's a sign. Of what, I'm not certain.
Steve Williams@Natasha_Jay
There’s another bike on the other side, but you need to be wearing VR goggles.
There’s another bike on the other side, but you need to be wearing VR goggles.
Analog AI@Natasha_Jay
Especially since we *know* there is sketch of a bicycle on the square facing the other way. Should we choose those too?
Especially since we *know* there is sketch of a bicycle on the square facing the other way. Should we choose those too?