wakestApr 2
What would thorough interoperability of username systems look like? I want to be able to @mention people across multiple networks. And I want this to be accessible to non nerds. From the atmosphere I want to be able to mention @[email protected] and from the fediverse @example.tld
Show threadwakestApr 2
This should be possible with robust bridges in place, or from platforms like @[email protected] that support both protocols.
Show threadwakestApr 2
what about updating the webfinger protocol to support DIDs and atmosphere handles on a protocol leval so that this would work without clients or server implementations having to do anything special.
Show threadwakestApr 2
And the other way around, how would getting the atmosphere to natively understand webfinger names and at least autolink them to their URL counterparts
Show threadwakestApr 2
And while we're at it we should support matrix handles too @name:example.tld
Show thread🫧 socialcoding..Apr 2

@wake.st

Didn't the #Spritely institute recently give further follow-up on the original paper around petname systems that @cwebber published years ago for the Web of Trust initiative? I find petnames to be very appealing myself, and should really catch up on the latest when I have time.

https://github.com/cwebber/rebooting-the-web-of-trust-spring2018/blob/petnames/draft-documents/petnames.md

Show threadwakest
How would you figure that would address this specific issue? Moving both the fediverse and the atmosphere to a pet name system instead?
Apr 2 at 2:57pmWeb
Show thread🫧 socialcoding..Apr 2
@wake.st @cwebber I am not sure for the case you are investigating, provided just my FYI. Other than that I am mulling petnames for Protosocial protocol, but that is personal hobby project atm, and mostly on pause rn.