The Free Press published a truly insane article by Jacob Siegel, who “investigated” whether me requesting a correction on a book review that said my team censored 22 million tweets was actually…censorship.

You read that right: a man who smeared me in his book got to smear me again in The Free Press after I tried to get the first smear fixed. The article says I “didn’t deny” pressuring an outlet to remove his review. So I got on the phone w/an editor there to categorically deny it. No change.🤷🏻‍♀️

RE: https://www.threads.com/@thefreepress/post/DWlcbcMFHu8

The Free Press (@thefreepress) on Threads

In today's Front Page: two stories about censorship. Could California elect a Republican governor? Apple and the age of surveillance. The teacher fired for an X post. And more.

Threads
I wrote my own Substack post about this bullshit because I had to endure nutjobs on Twitter insisting that not only had I censored the whole Internet in the 2020 election, and his review, but that it was my job to fix it. Yes. I should do PR for the liar.

I’ve got a much spicier story coming about Jacob Siegel’s book, but this is the story of a very strange day.

https://open.substack.com/pub/reneediresta/p/corrections-are-censorship-jacob?r=6vlt&utm_medium=ios
Corrections Are Censorship: Jacob Siegel’s Latest Fiction

Jacob Siegel misleads readers in his new book. When I asked for corrections, he cried censorship in The Free Press—writing as accuser, investigator, and fact-checker all in one. A lie-machine exposé.

Calling Bullshit on the Bullshit Industrial Complex