Interesting take by Cancer Research UK:

"We need efficient scholarly communications to spread scientific ideas via a fair economic model. We currently don’t have that. The #openaccess movement was bold and promising, but ultimately disappointing. Now is the time to stop and call for a new way to make publishing work…"

https://news.cancerresearchuk.org/2026/04/01/why-we-wont-be-funding-open-access-publishing-any-more/

"Ceasing to fund open access in the way we currently do will save us £5.2m of donors’ money over the next three years."

Why we won’t be funding open access publishing any more - Cancer Research UK - Cancer News

The open access movement was bold and promising, but ultimately disappointing. Now is the time to stop and call for a new way to make publishing work…

Cancer Research UK - Cancer News
@brembs Depends what they mean by "a new way to make publishing work". If they mean back to paywalls, no thanks.
@brembs The article does a fine job of diagnosing the problem, but seems remarkably short on plans for what they're going to do instead.

@mike

I love your Brittish understatement 😆