https://bugs.gentoo.org/971885 "app-editors/vim: Multiple High risk vulnerabilities in the past few days"
Pfahaha, makes me wonder if it's related to the vibe-code stuff it got in there lately.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/971885 "app-editors/vim: Multiple High risk vulnerabilities in the past few days"
Pfahaha, makes me wonder if it's related to the vibe-code stuff it got in there lately.
@lanodan I don't use vim so not for me to do really, but I'm just waiting for someone to package one of these "boring forks".
From what I saw, at least some of these vulnerabilities (not sure if it's the ones in this bug but wrt the ones going around recently), they got introduced pretty recently and couldn't be repro'd on say Debian stable, so any fork would likely be okay if it's from a little while ago..
@mid_kid @lanodan rsync hasn't added a few features we've sent PRs for, but so what? I also don't think 2 claude commits really means full blown disregard for any quality whatsoever.
Supposing one does consider that tainted or it gets worse, we either use older rsync or openrsync perhaps, it's not like anyone is going to notice some missing feature in that.
/usr/bin/rsync provider without checking for some time)@mid_kid @lanodan I do think Vim has always been a bit of a rough situation at least since the huge numbers of CVEs started, because you'd end up being nudged to upgrade quickly and there'd be various regressions.
This just means there's more regressions. It's not uncommon to move more slowly with such upstreams or to stick to an older version.
For this reason, we have (for as long as I've paid any attention to packaging) not rushed to update Vim, often being behind by quite a bit, because of how much broke even pre-LLMs.
@thesamesam @lanodan FWIW, it does make me happy to see people fighting the fights I'm too tired to engage :)
Is there any big plans for gentoo regarding this? Will the project switch to non-AI alternatives where possible?
@mid_kid @lanodan See the discussion at https://public-inbox.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/[email protected]/
I don't think we have a clear plan or rule yet, though e.g. a bunch of Perl modules have newer versions masked because they're now nearly "autonomously developed", some Python libraries are in package.deprecated or last-rited, ...
@lanodan @mid_kid I did try to focus on practical technical measures and I think I killed the conversation, but nobody has complained (and several have supported) what we've done with Perl.
One of those things where sometimes having the discussion is useful in that there's no clear wrong (or right) answer, so you have some licence to go ahead.
@lanodan yea…
but when that kind of thing happens to vim or linux or hurd it makes me lose hope 