Emmet O'Neill
raghukamath@emmetoneill I think both can go in parallel. Often the tech needed for rockets ends up helping people on ground. So both side should be encouraged.
@raghukamath Maybe they can. But right now they aren't.
America already landed people on the moon almost 60 years ago, and we've launched plenty of rockets and satellites since. (We've made plenty of ICBMs with this tech too.)
But we still haven't met the needs of our people. ~10% of Americans have no healthcare. We're told "it can't be done".
I'm not against science or space exploration, but we don't really need to go *back* to the moon to solve the problems that we face here on Earth.
@emmetoneill I disagree with you here. I mean not the part that U.S.A needs to be on moon or not. But humans should explore space. May be collectively they should do it. And they should also provide for healthcare and other essential things which uplift human living standards back on earth.
Not having healthcare and other stuff is a failure of govt. We should correct the failure but in correcting one failure we should not clamp down on other good thing that govt. is doing. Making scientific progress and also making progress in human living standard both are important they should not be seen as one or the other.
Not having healthcare and other stuff is a failure of govt. We should correct the failure but in correcting one failure we should not clamp down on other good thing that govt. is doing. Making scientific progress and also making progress in human living standard both are important they should not be seen as one or the other.