Paul Cantrell9h ago

An AI corporation crying big tears over having its code copied without its consent in a way that undermines its business, maybe its very existence?

If it’s an April Fools joke, it’s brilliant.

It it’s not an April Fools joke, it’s even more brilliant. https://mastodon.cloud/@slashdot/116330548519902234

Slashdot :verified: (@[email protected])

Anthropic Issues Copyright Takedown Requests To Remove 8,000 Copies of Claude Code Source Code https://developers.slashdot.org/story/26/04/01/158240/anthropic-issues-copyright-takedown-requests-to-remove-8000-copies-of-claude-code-source-code?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon

mastodon.cloud
Show threadFrancisca Sinn

@inthehands The thing is, the SCOTUS just confirmed that there’s no copyright in “AI” generated output. And Anthropic has boasted about how Claude codes Claude so, as numerous IP lawyers like me have warned, Anthropic is in a pickle. They’d *like* to say they have copyright and no one cans scrape and use it, but they’re in court arguing it’s legal for companies (them) to use whatever they can get their hands on, so… [insert gif of tiniest tiny violin] 😂

Background: https://www.theverge.com/policy/887678/supreme-court-ai-art-copyright

AI-generated art can’t be copyrighted after Supreme Court declines to review the rule

The US Supreme Court has declined to hear a case over whether AI-generated art can be copyrighted.

The Verge
11:15pmWeb