sometimes you see a piece of code so beautiful you simply must commit it to physical media in the most elegant way you know
sometimes you see a piece of code so beautiful you simply must commit it to physical media in the most elegant way you know
wtf|wth and not wt(f|h)? Why are "horrible" and "awful" in there twice? Why fuck you|screw (this|you) and not (screw|fuck) (this|(yo)?u) ((bull)?shit|crap)? But there is no use trying to understand it because there is no thought or intention behind it. Simply a mindless word generator that got tossed at a problem again and again until the droppings accreted into something that worked well enough.@nev i agree with you, but
i authored a system that used regex for sentiment analysis in english language pathology reports. we achieved an incredibly high sensitivity and specificity (precision and recall) and i'm really proud of the work
i think because of the very narrow problem space, and the ways in which pathologists tended to hedge their bets on diagnoses that might or might not be cancer, it was more straightforward.
i'd never attempt to use it writ large like this.
title: "please don't be mean to me"
"this is so frustrating" was me. you know, teacher talk... but where is "I am disappointed" ?
Wow. The depth and quality of bleeding edge AI code is staggering.
Makes me want to cry.
A really amazing feat.