I mean perhaps we shouldn't organize our society in such a way that it results in 9 berobbed priests deciding if we have fundamental rights or not roughly once every 6 months with little to no recourse inside said system for justice if they decide we don't?

Perhaps, and I'm just speaking theoretically here, America is not in fact the utopian ideal of democracy and goodness in the world and maybe, just maybe, doing things differently than this would be better.

Them: "No you see, what we have to do is win every single election for the next forty years, regardless of how shit-tier Reaganite the candidates are, and then perhaps we can replace at least 3 of those fascist high priests with high priests who aren't fascists but love to have lunch with them while seeking bipartisan compromise!"

Dipshits: "Oh yeah that sounds way more realistic than a revolution..."

@AnarchoNinaWrites USA and Iran both having laws thumbed up or down by the Council of Elders is so on the nose, that it defies comedy.
@JoachimSelliken @AnarchoNinaWrites I'm less and less finding arguments against simulation theory as convincing as I once did...