RE: https://cosocial.ca/@mhoye/116325532654671149

OK, this is evil. #Anthropic specifically coding #Claude to be nontransparent / opaque. Should we stop talking about bringing them to the EU now? Fully against the spirit, intent, and law of the #AIAct. Unless those guys are REALLY convincing that they never wanted to do this and want raw money less than to be working within functioning democracies and the rule of law. #AIEthics #devops

@j2bryson that's not necessarily evil. I've actually been using Ollama and Claude to write commit messages for me and it's 10x better than what I would do. However, I have a similar function because I don't want my clients to see the repo and just assume the entire thing was vibe-coded.

AI isn't going away, but it should be used for handling the skut work and some analysis, not real design work. It sucks at that.

For this, however, with the shit I see from my developers any even myself, I really prefer it.

What is the problem with prompting a coding assistant to not include internal codenames and versions in commit messages when the user type is an anthropic internal user who may be working with unreleased versions of Claude and Claude code? I fail to see how this is lying by any definition.