lpcvoidMar 31

Microsoft: Copilot is for entertainment purposes only

https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-copilot/for-individuals/termsofuse

Copilot - Terms of Use

Microsoft Copilot
Show threadeverdriveMar 31
Lawyers are playing Calvinball again. I have no idea why the law finds this kind of argumentation compelling. "I clearly intentionally deceived, but I stashed some bullshit legalese into a document no one will read so my deception is completely OK."
Show threadtorginusMar 31

My two cents is that if it didn't, 'I didn't know that was illegal/breach of contract' would be a valid legal defense.

Although intentionally saying things that contradict whats in the contract might be legally objectionable.

Show threadmarcosdumayMar 31

When the contract is purposefully obtuse and hard to understand, that should be a valid legal defense.

When it's huge, falls upon people that can't justify a lawyer, and keeps changing all the time, one shouldn't even need to claim it. It should be automatically invalid.

Show threadvoxic11Mar 31

> Copilot is for entertainment purposes only. It can make mistakes, and it may not work as intended. Don’t rely on Copilot for important advice. Use Copilot at your own risk.

Seems pretty clear to me, do you really think people need a lawyer to understand that?

Show threadlazideMar 31
If it’s in a locked cabinet in the downstairs bathroom with the ‘out of order’ sign on the door, guarded by a leopard?
Show threadrecursive
A disused lavatory?
Mar 31 at 4:04pmWeb
Show threadlazideMar 31
We can neither confirm nor deny on advice of counsel.