Do some climate protests backfire because they’re disruptive, or because they target the “wrong” people?

A preprint of my latest project has just been uploaded to PsyArXiv:
📄 https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/f7vyk_v1

Across two preregistered studies (US & UK), we find:
🎯 The exact same disruptive tactic is judged very differently depending on the target of disruption.
🎯 Targeting “undeserving” entities → perceived as more immoral, unjust, and anger-inducing.
🎯 Leads to lower support for activists.

Suggests that backlash to extreme climate activism isn’t just about the extremity of tactics, but the perceived deservingness of who those tactics disrupt.

It was a pleasure to work on this paper with Matthew Hornsey, Michael Thai, and Maja Kutlaca. 🙏

https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/f7vyk_v1

OSF