Are we having fun yet?

https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28627

Shor's algorithm is possible with as few as 10,000 reconfigurable atomic qubits

Quantum computers have the potential to perform computational tasks beyond the reach of classical machines. A prominent example is Shor's algorithm for integer factorization and discrete logarithms, which is of both fundamental importance and practical relevance to cryptography. However, due to the high overhead of quantum error correction, optimized resource estimates for cryptographically relevant instances of Shor's algorithm require millions of physical qubits. Here, by leveraging advances in high-rate quantum error-correcting codes, efficient logical instruction sets, and circuit design, we show that Shor's algorithm can be executed at cryptographically relevant scales with as few as 10,000 reconfigurable atomic qubits. Increasing the number of physical qubits improves time efficiency by enabling greater parallelism; under plausible assumptions, the runtime for discrete logarithms on the P-256 elliptic curve could be just a few days for a system with 26,000 physical qubits, while the runtime for factoring RSA-2048 integers is one to two orders of magnitude longer. Recent neutral-atom experiments have demonstrated universal fault-tolerant operations below the error-correction threshold, computation on arrays of hundreds of qubits, and trapping arrays with more than 6,000 highly coherent qubits. Although substantial engineering challenges remain, our theoretical analysis indicates that an appropriately designed neutral-atom architecture could support quantum computation at cryptographically relevant scales. More broadly, these results highlight the capability of neutral atoms for fault-tolerant quantum computing with wide-ranging scientific and technological applications.

arXiv.org

Oh, and in case you weren't having enough fun, here are some updated resource estimates for running Shor's on elliptic curves, unfortunately weirdly focused on cryptocurrencies.

Fun fact: I almost found a soundness problem in that zero knowledge proof that was based on a quine. Unfortunately the circuit cannot produce quines.

https://research.google/blog/safeguarding-cryptocurrency-by-disclosing-quantum-vulnerabilities-responsibly/

Safeguarding cryptocurrency by disclosing quantum vulnerabilities responsibly

@sophieschmieg On the one hand a weird focus on cryptocurrency is weird, on the other if we managed to break all of the cryptocurrencies with relatively small/cheap (relatively!) quantum computers I suspect I would laugh so hard I hurt myself. And then I'd send pastries to whoever worked out how to do that because they 100% deserved them.